Luis Ricardo Falero
(Source: f-ascinations, via glitterghoul)
(Source: teen-witches, via princessgrump)
Customer photo in the ‘Charlotte’ Knickers
buddhabrot: my future house
The concern for overly exposed young bodies may be well-intentioned. With society fetishizing girls at younger and younger ages, girls are instructed to self-objectify and see themselves as sexual objects, something to be looked at. A laundry list of problems can come from obsessing over one’s appearance: eating disorders, depression, low self-worth. Who wouldn’t want to spare her daughter from these struggles?
But these dress codes fall short of being legitimately helpful. What we fail to consider when enforcing restrictions on skirt-length and the tightness of pants is the girls themselves—not just their clothes, but their thoughts, emotions, budding sexuality and self-image.
Instead, these restrictions are executed with distracted boys in mind, casting girls as inherent sexual threats needing to be tamed. Dress restrictions in schools contribute to the very problem they aim to solve: the objectification of young girls. When you tell a girl what to wear (or force her to cover up with an oversized T-shirt), you control her body. When you control a girl’s body—even if it is ostensibly for her “own good”—you take away her agency. You tell her that her body is not her own.
When you deem a girl’s dress “inappropriate,” you’re also telling her, “Because your body may distract boys, your body is inappropriate. Cover it up.” You recontextualize her body; she now exists through the male gaze. — What Do Dress Codes Say About Girls’ Bodies? (via becauseiamawoman)
(Source: autrumsuicide, via infinitelyluna)
Petals on the runway of Sonia Rykiel Spring 2009
(Source: softwaring, via sugar-cum)
(Source: asuka-shinji, via peachymeow)